Menu

Pal 60Hz C64 bad picture quality

Home Forums RetroTink 2x Pal 60Hz C64 bad picture quality

This topic contains 4 replies, has 3 voices, and was last updated by  Mock 6 months, 2 weeks ago.

Viewing 5 posts - 1 through 5 (of 5 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #26012

    stripecat
    Participant

    Hello
    I just set my RetroTink2x up and connected my Commodore C64 Pal 60 Hz with S-video to the my new HDMI Samsung 24 inch display. One mode is a very good black and white mode with sharp text and good contrasts. Another modes gives a colour image with weird scan lines and horrible contrasts. It really looks awful. Ive tried the smoothing effects and it really doesn’t help. No other modes produce anything useful. Any ideas as to why this doesn’t work?

    Regards
    Erik

    #26013

    nmalinoski
    Participant

    The RT2X doesn’t properly support PAL60. If you can, stick to 50Hz modes; otherwise you’ll need to use a different device, like VGP’s upcoming Koryuu, or one of those unbranded composite/S-Video scalers you see on Amazon and eBay.

    #26017

    stripecat
    Participant

    Ok. That’s interesting. Is there any way I can get my C64 to produce a 50 Hz signal? I have never heard that it was possible to do that.

    #26018

    stripecat
    Participant

    Actually, when I think about it. It should be 50 Hz already. This is a standard C64 connected to the Swedish (European) grid. I was wrong in assuming it would be 60 Hz. Sorry.

    #26082

    Mock
    Participant

    Do you have another display like a CRT (without Retrotink) to try, or an alternate method of getting the S-video to HDMI like the converters nmalinoski mentioned?

    Sounds like you might be having a similar issue to what I have with my Sega 32X.

    Basically, the Retrotink can’t handle colour signals over S-video that are too far out of spec. Other equipment such as the cheapo amazon converters grant a lot more leeway and would help in diagnosing the issue (they should work), but of course they are laggy as hell and stretch the image to 16:9, which is obviously why we want to use Retrotink instead. 🙂

Viewing 5 posts - 1 through 5 (of 5 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.